
|
[si-list]
||
[Date Prev]
[02-2002 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[02-2002 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[SI-LIST] package models
- From: "Carlos Moll" <cmoll@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:10:32 -0800
There is noticeable changes in today's requirements for package modeling =
and the distribution formats of such models. To keep it simply, =
lumped, narrow bandwidth, uncoupled package models are no longer =
supporting the level of accuracy needed for dealing with high speed =
design issues. Additionally, an end goal would be to support concurrent =
Chip-Package-PCB design.
There are various model types available (just looking for format info at =
this point, which would be irrelevant on the solvers used and whether =
flipchip or wirebond technology)
Some examples;
Lumped, uncoupled
Lumped, Coupled
Distributed t-line=20
PEEC Based....
with a wide range of formats (ebd, dml, spice, s-param, etc..) which =
could be used either in the time domain or frequency domain or both....=20
So, the question would be what would be the preferred format for =
supporting the more advanced, coupling based package models?
Thank you for the input.
Carlos Moll
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
|

|