Browse pure-silver: This Month's Archive • Main Archive Page • Related posts • Previous by Date • Next by Date

[pure-silver] Re: Transition from MF to LF

From: "Koch, Gerald" <gkoch02@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 16:50:20 -0400

Just a word of caution.  Just because the film in different formats have
the same name is no guarantee that they are same emulsion.  IIRC, for
some years the Plus-X in LF was different from the Plus-X in the other
formats.

Jerry

-----Original Message-----
From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Len Eselson
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 4:15 PM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Transition from MF to LF


I am incorporating LF in my photography, moving up from 
MF. For MF film I use small tanks with a capacity of 1 or 2 
rolls of 120.  For LF 4X5, I have secured an HP Combi-Plan 
daylight tank with a capacity of 6 4X5 sheets. 

Agitation in both cases is by traditional 'tipping'.

Question: Can I anticipate that development times worked out 
for the 120 film will carry over to the 4X5, or is retesting needed. 
Primary film is TMAX 100.

Thanks

Len Eselson





========================================================================
=====================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
============================================================================================================To
 unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account 
(the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and 
unsubscribe from there.

Follow-Ups:

[pure-silver] Re: Transition from MF to LF
From: Richard Knoppow

[pure-silver] Re: Transition from MF to LF

Other related posts: