
|
[ossrp-control]
||
[Date Prev]
[04-2005 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[04-2005 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[ossrp-control] Re: So, where do you want the project to go?
- From: "Travis Roth" <travis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ossrp-control@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 14:14:00 -0500
Hello Gordan,
I do not fully understand the commentary about Microsoft.=20
The goal here is to have an access solution for a operating system that =
will
not force the user to spend lots of money on something that they have to
have.
Instead the goal is to provide the same functionality they will need =
(ala
the tools ot use the OS) that a normal person will have by spending the =
same
amount of money.
The idea is low cost, but not necessarily free.
Linux and other operating systems are great and have their place. And =
they
have projects for them as well. But access is stil needed by many for =
the
commercial operating system.
** Travis Roth
www.TravisRoth.com
travis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: ossrp-control-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ossrp-control-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gordon =
Montgomery
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 2:08 PM
To: ossrp-control@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ossrp-control] Re: So, where do you want the project to go?
Can't we just gather all ideas first and then appoint sub group leaders? =
We
are global after all not just a UK or US group.
I agree the Longhorn screen reader is a pretty good idea but what would=20
be wrong
with a little bit of initial "blue-sky-ing" here and looking at what we=20
want...what we really, really want?
See this article:=20
http://news.com.com/5208-1016-0.html?forumID=3D1&threadID=3D2499&messageI=
D=3D13862
&start=3D-189
It's Microsoft that has boxed us into this situation (them and the=20
reader software people) why should we continue to pander to them?
Installing a new OS and new application software is not that hard these=20
days. Linux, Mac OS X tiger, etc...
There's Mozilla's browser and e-mail and calendar functionality and even =
OpenOffice.
Basically, I'm just confused between the use of "open source" and "build =
it for Longhorn" in this project description.
- would somebody (will?) care to explain that one, please?
thx.
g.
Gordon Montgomery
Information design consultant
http://gmeta.com
512 377 9691 (w)
512 299 3637 (m)
|

|