Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



Browse oracle-l: This Month's ArchiveMain Archive PageRelated postsPrevious by DateNext by Date

Re: RAID 5+1 and BAARF

  • From: "Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:31:54 +0000
On 11/2/06, Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


                Mitigated, yes, but not eliminated. At some point the
cache will be exhausted, and then performance will hit the floor. Bear
in mind that you will likely have Oracle and filesystem cache's involved

                                                             ^^^^^
EEEEEK, why?


On Linux...

9iR1
< 9.2.0.4
RHAS 2.1
Haven't configured dio at all
RHAS 3 and tried to do aio and dio
Note *297521.1*

They haven't seen the light and decided to use ASM :)

But in all fairness likely is probably overstating the case.

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info

Other related posts:

  • RAID 5+1 and BAARF
  • Re: RAID 5+1 and BAARF
  • Re: RAID 5+1 and BAARF
  • RE: RAID 5+1 and BAARF
  • Re: RAID 5+1 and BAARF




  • [ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

    All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
    Everything else ©2008 Avenir Technologies, LLC.