Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



Browse oracle-l: This Month's ArchiveMain Archive PageRelated postsPrevious by DateNext by Date

Re: 10g OFA and OPatch, friend or foe?

  • From: Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bdbafh@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:22:14 -0700
> 
> See Note:229773.1 - ALERT: Applying Multiple Interim Patches Using
> OPatch Can Cause Inventory Corruption
> 

Hi Paul,

Here are the results from my linux server, which has 8.1.7.4,
9.2.0.5 and 10.1.0.2:

-----
0:28-:dv03:oracle-/dev/pts/1 > cat /etc/oraInst.loc
inventory_loc=/u01/app/oracle/product/oraInventory
inst_group=dba
[ /u01/app/oracle/admin/dv03/bdump/tmp ]

0:30-:dv03:oracle-/dev/pts/1 > cat /u01/app/oracle/product/oraInventory/oui.loc
InstLoc=/u01/app/oracle/product/9.2.0/oui
InstVer=10.1.0.2.0
[ /u01/app/oracle/admin/dv03/bdump/tmp ]

0:30-:dv03:oracle-/dev/pts/1 >
-----

So if, I understand this correctly, I need to install 2.2.0.18 OUI, displacing
the current 10.1 version, so as to avoid this bug.   Is that they way you
read this?

The reason for my confusion is that the 10.1 OUI was *required* to install
the 9.2.0.4 patch set.  So, what happens when I try to install 9.2.0.6, whenever
it appears?

And patches to 10g?

This alert is not giving me a warm fuzzy feeling.


--- 
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts:

  • 10g OFA and OPatch, friend or foe?
  • Re: 10g OFA and OPatch, friend or foe?




  • [ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

    All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
    Everything else ©2008 Avenir Technologies, LLC.