|
[oracle-l]
||
[Date Prev]
[08-2004 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[08-2004 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
RE: 10046 event is useless in 9.2.0.4 version for response time measuring !!!
- From: J.Velikanovs@xxxxxxxx
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 18:45:33 +0300
Cary,
Thanks for your replay,
But that the ?
How to discover performance problems on 9.2.0.4, then?
It is seem that 9.2.0.5 not the option ;(
.
Is to ask backport is a good idea in this case, I wonder.
Does some body in the list have tried it?
.
Cary, that is your experience? How to get around it?
.
PS Forgot to mention, test has been executed on the one machine. Two
separate OH. RH AS 3.0.
Regards,
Jurijs
9268222
============================================
http://otn.oracle.com/ocm/jvelikanovs.html
"Cary Millsap" <cary.millsap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
02.08.2004 18:07
Please respond to oracle-l
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject: RE: 10046 event is useless in 9.2.0.4 version for
response time measuring !!!
Jurijs,
You've identified the bug correctly. The response time impact will vary =
from
virtually zero to the 6X number you've discovered, or even worse. (The
problem is the worst for sessions that nest NESTED LOOPS row source
operations inside each other.)
It's a bug. Fix it. The problem is fixed in 9.2.0.5.
Cary Millsap
Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
http://www.hotsos.com
* Nullius in verba *
Upcoming events:
- Performance Diagnosis 101: 8/10 Boston, 9/14 San Francisco, 10/5 =
Charlotte
- SQL Optimization 101: 7/26 Washington DC, 8/16 Minneapolis, 9/20 =
Hartford
- Hotsos Symposium 2005: March 6-10 Dallas
- Visit www.hotsos.com for schedule details...
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx =
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of J.Velikanovs@xxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 8:19 AM
To: 'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx '
Subject: 10046 event is useless in 9.2.0.4 version for response time
measuring !!!
My regards to all,
At the moment I have impression that, 10046 event is useless in 9.2.0.4=20
version for response time measuring!
I have tied to run loop.sql (see below for full text) with and without=20
10046 event on 9.2.0.4 & 9.2.0.5.
The results scared me.
Take a look:
.
9.2.0.4=20
without 6,45 sec=20
!!!!!!!!!!! with 37,36 sec=20
.
9.2.0.5
without 5,48 sec=20
!!!!!!!!!!! with 7,19 sec
.
After short investigation it is appears that it is BUG 3009359.
http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/showdoc?db=3DNOT&id=3D3009359.8=
No one-off fix on 9.2.0.4.
.
So it's appears, that 10046 is useless on 9.2.0.4, because SQL Trace=20
itself takes 580% of response time.
.
Any comments?!
Have any body solution for this issue.
.
As appears from dictation from this list, to go to 9.2.0.5 is not good=20
idea, because of instability and other issues.
Thanks in advance,
Jurijs
******************************************
-- loop.sql
declare
vn number;
begin
for f in 1..1000 loop
select count(v) into vn from testlio where n between 10000 and 20000;
end loop;
end;
/
******************************************
TKPROF output
******************************************
9204
******************************************
SELECT count(v)
from
testlio where n between 10000 and 20000
call count cpu elapsed disk query current =
rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------=20
----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 =
0
Execute 1000 0.08 0.08 0 0 0 =
0
Fetch 1000 37.07 36.19 0 132000 0 =
1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------=20
----------
total 2001 37.15 36.27 0 132000 0 =
1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: SYS (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 SORT AGGREGATE (cr=3D132000 r=3D0 w=3D0 time=3D36185613 us)
10001000 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TESTLIO (cr=3D132000 r=3D0 w=3D0=20
time=3D28015044 us)
10001000 INDEX RANGE SCAN TESTLIO_I1 (cr=3D25000 r=3D0 w=3D0 =
time=3D9976625=20
us)(object id 6318)
******************************************
9205
******************************************
SELECT COUNT(V)
FROM
TESTLIO WHERE N BETWEEN 10000 AND 20000
call count cpu elapsed disk query current =
rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------=20
----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 =
0
Execute 1000 0.05 0.07 0 0 0 =
0
Fetch 1000 6.89 6.72 0 132000 0 =
1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------=20
----------
total 2001 6.94 6.81 0 132000 0 =
1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: SYS (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 SORT AGGREGATE
10001000 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TESTLIO
10001000 INDEX RANGE SCAN TESTLIO_I1 (object id 6289)
******************************************
RAW portion of TRC file
******************************************
9204
******************************************
PARSING IN CURSOR #5 len=3D60 dep=3D1 uid=3D0 oct=3D3 lid=3D0 =
tim=3D1065854307286108=20
hv=3D518780277 ad=3D'5aca2538'
SELECT count(v) from testlio where n between 10000 and 20000
END OF STMT
PARSE =
#5:c=3D0,e=3D485,p=3D0,cr=3D0,cu=3D0,mis=3D1,r=3D0,dep=3D1,og=3D4,tim=3D1=
065854307286097
BINDS #5:
EXEC =
#5:c=3D0,e=3D134,p=3D0,cr=3D0,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D0,dep=3D1,og=3D4,tim=3D1=
065854307286405
FETCH=20
#5:c=3D40000,e=3D36240,p=3D0,cr=3D132,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D1,dep=3D1,og=3D4=
,tim=3D1065854307322684
BINDS #5:
EXEC =
#5:c=3D0,e=3D85,p=3D0,cr=3D0,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D0,dep=3D1,og=3D4,tim=3D10=
65854307322899
FETCH=20
#5:c=3D40000,e=3D36128,p=3D0,cr=3D132,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D1,dep=3D1,og=3D4=
,tim=3D1065854307359065
BINDS #5:
EXEC =
#5:c=3D0,e=3D81,p=3D0,cr=3D0,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D0,dep=3D1,og=3D4,tim=3D10=
65854307359268
FETCH=20
#5:c=3D30000,e=3D36181,p=3D0,cr=3D132,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D1,dep=3D1,og=3D4=
,tim=3D1065854307395487
BINDS #5:
EXEC =
#5:c=3D0,e=3D81,p=3D0,cr=3D0,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D0,dep=3D1,og=3D4,tim=3D10=
65854307395689
FETCH=20
#5:c=3D40000,e=3D36145,p=3D0,cr=3D132,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D1,dep=3D1,og=3D4=
,tim=3D1065854307431871
BINDS #5:
******************************************
9204
******************************************
PARSING IN CURSOR #5 len=3D60 dep=3D1 uid=3D0 oct=3D3 lid=3D0 =
tim=3D1065854501680779=20
hv=3D4259315813 ad=3D'5bc9bfdc'
SELECT COUNT(V) FROM TESTLIO WHERE N BETWEEN 10000 AND 20000
END OF STMT
PARSE=20
#5:c=3D0,e=3D7476,p=3D0,cr=3D0,cu=3D0,mis=3D1,r=3D0,dep=3D1,og=3D4,tim=3D=
1065854501680769
BINDS #5:
EXEC =
#5:c=3D0,e=3D134,p=3D0,cr=3D0,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D0,dep=3D1,og=3D4,tim=3D1=
065854501681077
FETCH=20
#5:c=3D10000,e=3D6736,p=3D0,cr=3D132,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D1,dep=3D1,og=3D4,=
tim=3D1065854501687852
BINDS #5:
EXEC =
#5:c=3D0,e=3D82,p=3D0,cr=3D0,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D0,dep=3D1,og=3D4,tim=3D10=
65854501688065
FETCH=20
#5:c=3D0,e=3D6707,p=3D0,cr=3D132,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D1,dep=3D1,og=3D4,tim=3D=
1065854501694810
BINDS #5:
EXEC =
#5:c=3D0,e=3D81,p=3D0,cr=3D0,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D0,dep=3D1,og=3D4,tim=3D10=
65854501695011
FETCH=20
#5:c=3D10000,e=3D6699,p=3D0,cr=3D132,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D1,dep=3D1,og=3D4,=
tim=3D1065854501701747
BINDS #5:
EXEC =
#5:c=3D0,e=3D79,p=3D0,cr=3D0,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D0,dep=3D1,og=3D4,tim=3D10=
65854501701944
FETCH=20
#5:c=3D10000,e=3D6747,p=3D0,cr=3D132,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D1,dep=3D1,og=3D4,=
tim=3D1065854501708729
BINDS #5:
EXEC =
#5:c=3D0,e=3D80,p=3D0,cr=3D0,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D0,dep=3D1,og=3D4,tim=3D10=
65854501708927
FETCH=20
#5:c=3D10000,e=3D6650,p=3D0,cr=3D132,cu=3D0,mis=3D0,r=3D1,dep=3D1,og=3D4,=
tim=3D1065854501715614
BINDS #5:
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D
-- mk loop
drop table testlio ;
create table testlio (n number, v varchar2(1000)) tablespace users;
begin for f in 1..30000 loop
insert into testlio values=20
(f,'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa');=
end loop;
end;
/
create index testlio_i1 on testlio (n) tablespace users;
Jurijs
9268222
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
http://otn.oracle.com/ocm/jvelikanovs.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
