Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



[oracle-l] || [Date Prev] [07-2006 Date Index] [Date Next] || [Thread Prev] [07-2006 Thread Index] [Thread Next]

** temp table or permanent

  • From: A Joshi <ajoshi977@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 07:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Hi,
     I had a big query which was running out of rollback so after some tuning i 
had to break it down in to two. from the first query i store the result in a 
temporary table and then use it for second part. it is still slow. i did not 
use permament table since that could involve rollback/redo. but still i will 
try to check it. i am also thinking of pl/sql table but if that always remains 
in memory then it could impact memory or sga. pl/sql table uses pga or OS 
memory but if paging swapping occurs then it would impact sga too. Will it 
always be faster than temp or permanent table? Can some one give feedback if 
you had similar experience. Thanks for help. 

                
---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.  Great rates 
starting at 1¢/min.




[ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
Everything else ©2007 Avenir Technologies, LLC.