FreeLists / oracle-l / Re: sort_area_size and hash_area_size

["David Sharples" <davidsharples@xxxxxxxxx>]

Do you have pga_aggregate_target set and work_areaaize_policy to automatic
(the defaults for 9i) becuase if you are and you are not using shared server
then the *_area_size parameters arent used

On 04/07/06, Oliver.Jost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <Oliver.Jost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thank you,Hi David,
>    I'm working on 9.2.0.6
>
>     Oliver
>
>
> ** The information in this e-mail message including any attachment is
> intended only for the named recipients above and may contain confidential
> information. If you have received this message in error, or are not the
> named recipient(s), please immediately notify the sender by replying to the
> message and deleting all copies of it from your computer. **
>
>
>
>   *"David Sharples" <davidsharples@xxxxxxxxx>*
>
> 07/04/2006 01:54 PM
>    To
>  Oliver.Jost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>   cc
> oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  Subject
> Re: sort_area_size and hash_area_size
>
>
>
>
> oracle version?
>
> On 04/07/06, *Oliver.Jost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx* <Oliver.Jost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> <*Oliver.Jost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> * <Oliver.Jost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>  I did some testing on this quite some time ago and was hoping to have a
> refresher.... I have an application with a particularly nasty view... given
> that I can not go in and fix the view without breaching protocol, I was
> going to increase the sort area size and hash area size at the session
> level.... Now that I'm revisiting this I remember there were some
> considerations for negatively impacting performance.  After failing to find
> any information on this negative impact... does anyone know of some
> considerations I should make before going forward?