|
[oracle-l]
||
[Date Prev]
[05-2005 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[05-2005 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
Re: Ora 4031
- From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 19:38:16 -0600
Mladen,
I have to second Yongping's sentiment. The required size of the shared pool
depends on a lot of factors. I am running several Peoplesoft databases with
a shared pool of 80-100M each and none is getting 4031 errors. Granted,
they are development instances.
I agreee that Oracle 9i probably needs a bit more shared pool than 8i, all
else being equal.
Laura,
do you have any non-default cursor parameters? Such as "open_cursors",
"session_cached_cursors", or "cursor_space_for_time"? What is the exact
error you are getting. Is it always the same routine that is getting the
error. Have you tried "keep"ing the "STANDARD" (and others) PL/SQL procedures?
At 06:18 PM 5/2/2005, Yongping Yao wrote:
>"9.2 needs more shared pool then 8.1.6. 256M is a bare minimum"
>gogala, how do you conclude that? We use several 9201 here with all
>the shared pool 120M, and Statspack didn't say it's busy. Well, one is
>OLTP and the others like DSS.
Regards
Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
|
|
