I'll skip the backup remark because, well it's indefensible really. On the
other hand isn't this actually quite a testament to the quality of early 10g
RAC?
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Dan Norris <dannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Agreed, but I was surprised to find a customer recently that has a
> single database (it's a 2-node RAC) that was installed on RH 3 and
> 10.1.0.3 about 3 years ago and they've never done any patches, upgrades,
> or DB maintenance to the system in that period
>
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> http://www.orawin.info
