To: <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>, "hrishy" <hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:00:27 -0400
Problem where no matter how slow the FTP is, is when you have to wait 4
days for Iron Mountain to return the tape!!
______________________________________________________________
Dick Goulet / Capgemini
North America P&C / East Business Unit
Senior Oracle DBA / Hosting
Office: 508.573.1978 / Mobile: 508.742.5795 / www.capgemini.com
Fax: 508.229.2019 / Email: richard.goulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
45 Bartlett St. / Marlborough, MA 01752
Together: the Collaborative Business Experience
______________________________________________________________
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jared Still
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 11:50 AM
To: hrishy
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Datafile recovery in datagaurd environment
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:18 AM, hrishy <hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Copying the datafile over the LAN and then recovering
it is faster then requesting the tape to be loaded and
then restore from tape to disk etc..
I guess it depends on the environment.
In a case like this it would be a good idea test just how fast
a single file can be retrieved from the backup system.
In our case, the tape libraries are pretty fast, the limiting factor
is network latency and bandwidth, not the speed of getting the
file from tape.
And yes, I have tested it. Pulling one 100meg file from a set
of 32 files takes 5 minutes. For us, that is plenty fast. Maybe
not for everyone.
Jared
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is
the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized
to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or
any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
