Excellent report. That is the type of information that I was looking for
and hoping to contribute to myself.
John
________________________________
From: E Rudans [mailto:oceheb@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: 06 March 2008 09:09
To: John Hallas
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Metrics for Swingbench benchmarks
Hello John,
I'm also currently exploring this nice tool. Recently I did small test
to check how really differs 32bit and 64bit oracle , and found that
swingbench is really easy to setup and possible to do some quick test (I
had only few days to test hardware). I did only small amount of load due
to lack of disk subsystem.
If anyone interested, my quick test results are here
<http://erudans.info/2008/03/06/oracle-32bin-vs-64-bit-quick-test/> I
found 5-10% difference and wonder if this is real or this is test issue
(test done wrong)
E. Rudans
Oracle DBA
http://erudans.info
Quoting John Hallas <john.hallas@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Swingbench is an excellent toolset and we are pushing our test
rig by using it. However I am not sure how to tell when you have an
optimum configuration or what a realistic throughput (TPM might be).
The information included in this email and any files transmitted with it may
contain information that is confidential and it must not be used by, or its
contents or attachments copied or disclosed, to persons other than the intended
addressee. If you have received this email in error, please notify BJSS.
In the absence of written agreement to the contrary BJSS’ relevant standard
terms of contract for any work to be undertaken will apply.
Please carry out virus or such other checks as you consider appropriate in
respect of this email. BJSS do not accept responsibility for any adverse
effect upon your system or data in relation to this email or any files
transmitted with it.
BJSS Limited, a company registered in England and Wales (Company Number
2777575), VAT Registration Number 613295452, Registered Office Address, First
Floor, Coronet House, Queen Street, Leeds, LS1 2TW
