
|
[opendtv]
||
[Date Prev]
[11-2007 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[11-2007 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[opendtv] Rising to the occasion ...
- From: "John Willkie" <johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:52:17 -0800
Here's what struck me in a post from John today:
"Therefore, all SD programming is 4:3 exclusively."
And
"In the US, 16:9 will forever remain the exclusive domain of HD."
704X480I is not an HDTV format, and I'm not aware of any ATSC or
ATSC-referenced specification that promulgates the use of the term "Enhanced
Definition" or ED.
I believe I have accurately quoted John Shutt, and unless provided with a
reference to an ATSC or ATSC-cited MPEG specification to the contrary, I see
HDTV, SDTV, and things that are less than SDTV.
I believe the statement directly above is incontrovertible.
So, all I need to disprove both of these is to show actual stream captures
that are 1) displayed in 16:9 and 2) use a format that doesn't qualify as
HDTV.
How's this? http://www.etherguidesystems.com/demos/default.aspx
And, I have previously conceded you were right about something - in my
subject area, John. I try to deal in facts, and I only try to attain
perfection, I never have claimed to have achieved it.
John Willkie jwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.EtherGuidesystems.com / www.OurEPG.com
Skype jmwillkie / Lab ++52 664 290-7526 / Mobile +1 619 770-5760
|

|