Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



Browse opendtv: This Month's ArchiveMain Archive PageRelated postsPrevious by DateNext by Date

[opendtv] One viewer just says no to the high of high-definition TV

  • From: Monty Solomon <monty@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: undisclosed-recipient:;
  • Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 13:55:10 -0400
CRITIC'S NOTEBOOK
One viewer just says no to the high of high-definition TV

By Matthew Gilbert, Globe Staff  |  June 8, 2008
The Boston Globe

I lost my high-definition virginity to "The View."

I'd seen the morning cluck-fest a hundred times before, but never 
like this, as crystalline and bright as a chandelier. In the table's 
mirror-like sheen, I saw reflections of the ladies' heads, like trees 
on the surface of a lake. I could almost smell the Lemon Pledge. 
Above the table and its happy coffee mugs, I could precisely locate 
the gap between Whoopi Goldberg's front teeth. I could isolate each 
of her dreads. I clearly saw that Joy Behar's mouth had been very 
freshly smeared with red, and that Elisabeth Hasselbeck had wisely 
put lines of mascara under her small eyes, to define. Look, there, in 
Hasselbeck's cleavage: a teeny, tiny cross.

My eyes tingle just remembering it all. Unaccustomed to the full 
disclosure that comes with HD's very many lines of resolution, its 
onslaught of visual data, I was blown away. If TV is like a drug, as 
some say, then I think HDTV must be like crystal meth, delivering a 
rush of hyper-clarity and sharpness straight to the head. "The View," 
the tennis players in the French Open, the gang on "How I Met Your 
Mother" - in HD, they all seem to be in "Toy Story," or some other 
Pixar animation. They appear more real than real. The phrase "eye 
candy" should have been invented for this TV delivery system, as it 
adds a sheer glaze of sugar to every image it conveys.

But I wonder: Is high-definition TV Too Much Information TV? When we 
watch a boxing match, do we really want to see every single drop of 
blood and sweat glistening in the klieg lights, sailing across the 
ring? Do we really need to see the "View" ladies, during a spat about 
Barack Obama, develop a veneer of perspiration, or glimpse the 
beating-hot overhead studio lights in the shine on guest Salman 
Rushdie's bald dome?

By February 9, 2009, the FCC has mandated that all TV broadcasts must 
be digital only. Analog TV transmission will be dead. And with that 
imminent and essential technical change will, undoubtedly, come the 
sale of even more HD-ready TV sets (which require a digital signal), 
more shows broadcast in HD, more raising of the definition bar. Those 
who already watch HDTV tend to be passionately in favor of it, and 
see it as the way of the future. And the truth is, if you watch HDTV 
and then switch back to SDTV - standard definition TV - you're left 
feeling visually unsatisfied. It's as if you've lost your 
prescription glasses. Years of "normal" TV imagery suddenly seems 
blurry, subpar, for Luddites only.

...

http://www.boston.com/ae/tv/articles/2008/06/08/one_viewer_just_says_no_to_the_high_of_high_definition_tv/

 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts:

  • [opendtv] One viewer just says no to the high of high-definition TV
  • [opendtv] Re: One viewer just says no to the high of high-definition TV
  • [opendtv] Re: One viewer just says no to the high of high-definition TV
  • [opendtv] Re: One viewer just says no to the high of high-definition TV
  • [opendtv] Re: One viewer just says no to the high of high-definition TV




  • [ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

    All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
    Everything else ©2008 Avenir Technologies, LLC.