
|
[openbeosstorage]
||
[Date Prev]
[12-2002 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[12-2002 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeosstorage] Re: First C Device API Draft
- From: Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:57:49 -0800
On 2002-12-17 at 09:53:38 [-0800], openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler ?= wrote:
>
> > Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > partscan (for partition scanner, better suggestions are welcome
> > > > :-)
> > > How about diskscan (more general, considering sessions)=3F Or
> > > storage=5Fdevice=5Fscanner (descriptive, though long)=3F
> >
> > What about just disk=5Fscanner=3F Anyway, I like diskscan and
> > storage=5Fdevice=5Fscanner both more than partscan :-)
>
> Damn, naming is always the hardest part -- coding is so much easier.
> ;-)
> If nobody minds, I will decide for one of the names before I check the
> stuff in (solved my ssh problem). This won't probably be before Friday
> night, though. If anyone feels like checking it in earlier, just go
> ahead.
I think I'll just leave the blame for the name to you this time. :)
> > I haven't got any time right now, but I'll try to do some useful
> > replies tomorrow!
>
> At least for me it's not that urgent. Tomorrow I will take a day off
> for a
> trip to the mountains and on Thursday I'll fly back to Germany,
> arriving
> at home Friday night.
>
> Tyler, if you have time and can't wait to do something ;-), I think,
> it wouldn't be a bad idea to write a BFS and a CD session module, so
> that we have at least one module of each kind for testing. In case we
> change the module API, they won't be too hard to adjust.
I have a skeleton BFS module working now, and will probably be able to
finish it tomorrow.
-Tyler
|

|