|
[openbeosstorage]
||
[Date Prev]
[06-2003 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[06-2003 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeosstorage] Re: Module location
- From: Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 19:51:19 -0700
On 2003-06-11 at 18:50:14 [-0700], Axel Dörfler wrote:
> Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2003-06-11 at 13:48:13 [-0700], Ingo Weinhold wrote:
> > > modules themselves, and those will probably stay in `file_systems'
> > > (even if turned from add-ons into modules), we perhaps want the
> > > modules for partitioning systems in `partitioning_systems'.
> > Sounds fine to me. `ps' would be okay by me, too, if `fs' is used.
>
> The path is "file_systems" - and I really don't like cryptic
> abbreviations like "ps" ("fs" could be an exception since it is very
> common), but it's okay to express yourself ;-P
I just didn't want to end up with:
(path)/fs
(path)/partitioning_systems
that's all. :-P :-)
-Tyler
|
|
