|
[openbeosstorage]
||
[Date Prev]
[05-2003 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[05-2003 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeosstorage] Re: Amiga RDB
- From: "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 20:25:15 +0200 CEST
"Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > We should give Amiga RDB the higher priority, because it's
> > > superior
> > > to the Intel partitioning scheme - but OTOH almost no one uses
> > > it,
> > > and
> > > it would slow down booting, so I wouldn't even consider doing
> > > that
> > > :-)
> > > So how does your ignoring side feel about this? :)
> > Confused basically. Do you want to ignore Amiga RDB, because
> > virtually
> > noone is using it, or ignore that it would be possible to have both
> > RDB
> > and Intel style partitions on the same disk?
>
> Ignore the fact that this would be possible, and give the Amiga RDB a
> lower priority on x86 systems. For PPC, we should give it a higher
> priority due to the fact that the Pegasos seems to use it as its
> native
> format.
Ah, OK.
> Ah well, I think we can tune this stuff later as well - we should
> have
> everything up and running first, anyway :-)
Sure. :-)
CU, Ingo
|
|
