Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



[openbeosstorage] || [Date Prev] [04-2002 Date Index] [Date Next] || [Thread Prev] [04-2002 Thread Index] [Thread Next]

[openbeosstorage] Re: BNode:set_fd and other things

  • From: Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 23:11:13 -0700
I never answered this, did I? 

> > Yes, I know what you mean. I haven't done any tests to figure out
> > whether or not it's necessary.
> That leads to the general question of integration tests. Some tests of
> this kind are already included in the unit tests, but e.g. in the case of
> BFile or BDirectory I don't test any inherited functionality. Perhaps some
> of the base class (BNode, BEntryList,...) tests can be made reusable for
> derived classes? E.g. providing a function that takes a pointer to a base
> class instance and performs tests on it.

My plan has been to leave this until we're done implementing.  

I wouldn't mind having the unit tests set up to allow inherited functionality 
to be tested though. I just haven't planned ahead for any such thing. I'll be 
polishing up the BNode and BEntry tests shortly, and will address that for 
those classes at that time.

-Tyler






[ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
Everything else ©2007 Avenir Technologies, LLC.