
|
[openbeosstorage]
||
[Date Prev]
[03-2003 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[03-2003 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeosstorage] Re: Partitioning rethink
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:44:28 +0100 CET
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Wow, I really had a lot of unanswered mail. Sorry for taking so
> > long on
> > most of these; I spent a great deal of time in bed with the flu
> > last
> > week. :-(
> Hope, you're better now.
Me too!
> > Pending Ingo's approval, what do you guys think about including
> > Reiser
> > support in the main cvs, too=3F
> No problem in principle, except maybe, that it is GPLed. I'm not sure
> what
> the official politics regarding code governed by the GPL is, though.
> If it
> is a separate component, like a FS add-on (or any add-on), it
> shouldn't
> do any harm.
I think so, too. We *will* have many GPL'd applications anyway, and I
think the ReiserFS would be a nice addition.
> > IMHO, it'd be good for us to include
> > out-of-the-box support for as many of the following as we can: bfs,
> > iso9660, fat, ext2/3, reiser, udf, ntfs, cdda.
> No need to make haste, I suppose, since they'll need to be ported to
> the
> new API anyway. So, we may as well wait until we have some time to do
> that.
Exactly - for now, the two file systems in our repository are for R5,
and I still haven't completed the OpenBeOS FS API yet.
Adios...
Axel.
|

|