|
[openbeosstorage]
||
[Date Prev]
[02-2003 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[02-2003 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeosstorage] Re: ISO9660/cdrom progress
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:21:39 +0100 CET
Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What I think this means for us is that (barring further discoveries)
> we
> can't completely know which volumes form a set without parsing the
> whole filesystem to look for references to othjer sessions, and even
> that fails in the event that all the files in the volume are updated.
That might be right, yes. Anyway, how does one differentiate between a
session of a multi-session volume, and a single session=3F AFAIK, the
single session uses session dependent block addressing, not global one
like the multi-sessions.
So we at least need a reliable way to differentiate between both.
Adios...
Axel.
|
|
