
|
[openbeosnetteam]
||
[Date Prev]
[11-2002 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[11-2002 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeosnetteam] Re: NetDebug.h break BC
- From: "Philippe Houdoin" <philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 22:45:08 +0100 (added by postmaster@wanadoo.fr)
Scott wrote:
> > Not, it's fine. I was just wondering why "protected".
>
> Doh! What I meant was that I would fix up the source I broke,
whipping the
> interfaces into shape. Just figured it would be quickest since I
authored
> the stuff. If you *want* to do the work, I certainly won't stop you.
;-)
I should be tired to quoted that badly.
To make myself (hopefully) clearer:
- yes, mutators & accessors are the generally accepted way to access
members data
- no, there's no other choice to make these data accessible from this
class
without breaking class signature
- no, I don't *want* to do the work, but thanks ;-)
- yes, please, fix up the broken source, would be quickest,
definitivly.
Philippe
--
Fortune Cookie Says:
You know you've landed gear-up when it takes full power to taxi.
--
Fortune Cookie Says:
Think twice before speaking, but don't say "think think click click".
|

|