
|
[openbeosnetteam]
||
[Date Prev]
[09-2003 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[09-2003 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeosnetteam] Re: moving ppp to other location
- From: Philippe Houdoin <philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:02:02 +0200
Axel, replying to Waldemar:
> > I will try to do that.
> > The PPP module for our core stack will probably be called
> > "ppp_interface_manager".
> > I actually wanted to call it "ppp", but this will conflict with the
> > subdirectory "ppp" where the module binaries should be put into.
>
> Why not just put the ppp module into network/ppp/?
The PPP interface module/manager, like any other network interface module,
should have a module name matching "network/interfaces/*", because the stack
load -all of- them via open_module_list("network/interfaces");.
As we like to keep source code layout similar to the binary location, I agree
with Waldemar here about the PPP interface module code source location to be
under src/add-ons/kernel/network/interfaces/<whatever>.
Now, about this "whatever" leaf module name, I guess "ppp" sounds good, even
if, in my mind, a more upper module should wrap all dial up networking
interfaces, hence a top "dun" module name. But, let's start with just PPP dial
up networking interfaces...
However, all others PPP sub-modules are PPP specifics: they follow a separate
PPP API, aka the core stack don't know nor handle them himself.
So, they should not be located under src/add-ons/kernel/network/interfaces/*
nor src/add-ons/kernel/network/protocols/*, as modules living here are expected
to follow the stack core API.
So, to isolate PPP sub-modules, it make sense to put them under
src/add-ons/kernel/network/ppp/*.
And shared code between them should be placed here, in a "shared" sub-folder.
> You know that there is no direct possibility to say open_module(const
> char *path)?
> You need to know the module name, not its file name to open it.
I guess Waldemar was talking of module name, not module path in this case.
> std_ops() are kernel private - you just don't touch them.
Agreed.
> > Well, some will like it, others will not. ;)
> > So, it will be called
> > "network/ppp/pppoe/v1"? Did I understand you correctly?
>
> That sounds good.
Thanks!
Hence a future PPPoE module source code location, under
src/add-ons/kernel/network/ppp/pppoe/*, using the PPP shared code
in src/add-ons/kernel/network/ppp/shared/*.
I hope having made that layout clear!?
;-)
-Philippe
|

|