
|
[openbeosnetteam]
||
[Date Prev]
[07-2006 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[07-2006 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeosnetteam] Re: Interfaces
- From: "Waldemar Kornewald" <wkornew@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:01:13 +0200
On 7/12/06, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nathan Whitehorn <nathanw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> FreeBSD, at the least, allows interfaces to be "up" without assigned
> addresses in any family. The state of being up is logically
> independent
> from having an address -- it merely implies that the device is
> available
> to send packets.
And the same will be true (or even is already) for our stack. And BONE,
too, for that matter.
Maybe the misunderstanding is that I was talking about the old
netstack doing something wrong? Well, at least, our old ethernet
module is rather inflexible in this regard. Anyway, I'm happy that our
new netstack will work as desired. :))
Bye,
Waldemar Kornewald
|

|