FreeLists / openbeosnetteam / [openbeosnetteam] Re: KPPPFSM.cpp,1.1,1.2

["Waldemar Kornewald" <Waldemar.Kornewald@xxxxxx>]

Axel Dörfler <"Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:> 
"Waldemar Kornewald" <Waldemar.Kornewald@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > If not you could do something like this:
> > > namespace PPP {
> > >   class FinalStateMachine()
> > > };
> > > 
> > > Just a suggestion; since you are doing the work, it's up to you 
> > > to 
> > > decide :-)
> > There is no way to have a clean interface without making this class 
> > publicly accessible. Otherwise the FSM events (mentioned in the 
> > RFC) 
> > will be spread over two or more classes which makes it harder to 
> > read.
> 
> Namespaces don't make classes private - just use either:
> 
> PPP::FinalStateMachine
> 
> or
> 
> using namespace PPP;
> FinalStateMachine
> 
> or what have you thought of?

Is PPPStateMachine not good enough? :)

If the others vote for it, too, I will put everything into the 
namespace PPP.
Hmmm, I could put it into Kernel::Network::PPP. :)

Waldemar