Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



[openbeosnetteam] || [Date Prev] [06-2006 Date Index] [Date Next] || [Thread Prev] [06-2006 Thread Index] [Thread Next]

[openbeosnetteam] ArGoSoft Mailing List Server

  • From: <emmanuel.jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: 26 Jun 2006 17:24:54 +0200
Command 

Axel, does anybody the rationale behind going for libnetwork.so? Is it only 
there to be able to have a fresh start? If so, I'd prefer going the 
libsocket.so/libbind.so route in our stack - even though I like libnetwork.so 
better, I can't stand the code duplication and library cluttering for almost 
nothing. The best would be to dynamically detect the ABI interface between R5, 
BONE and our ABI at runtime, not compile time. If we want to continue the BeOS 
Kit way, I don't see why we should split the *official* networking kit into 
several libraries (libnet.so -) Maybe I should see if our loader could support 
having both libsocket.so and libbind.so symlink to the one and only 
libnetwork.so instead. That trick works under R5, AFAIK. I use it everytime to 
switch between Mesa3D libGL.so libraries... And I fail to see why we should NOT 
support it under Haiku, whatever the libraries. Network-related or not. 
Philippe.

not understood.

Please send mail to emmanuel.jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxx, containing word HELP as the 
first non-blank line for the list of available commands.

ArGoSoft Mailing List Server







[ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
Everything else ©2007 Avenir Technologies, LLC.