|
[openbeosnetteam]
||
[Date Prev]
[06-2006 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[06-2006 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeosnetteam] libnetwork.so vs. libsocket.so/libbind.so
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Haiku Net-Team" <openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:05:36 +0200 CEST
Hi there,
does anybody the rationale behind going for libnetwork.so?
Is it only there to be able to have a fresh start? If so, I'd prefer
going the libsocket.so/libbind.so route in our stack - even though I
like libnetwork.so better, I can't stand the code duplication and
library cluttering for almost nothing.
Maybe I should see if our loader could support having both libsocket.so
and libbind.so symlink to the one and only libnetwork.so instead.
Bye,
Axel.
|
|
