Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



[openbeosnetteam] || [Date Prev] [06-2002 Date Index] [Date Next] || [Thread Prev] [06-2002 Thread Index] [Thread Next]

[openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...

  • From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 16:14:51 CEST (+0200)
> > The following code gets moved into the kernel proper...
> > - mbuf's
> > - pools (although he has soemthing similar already so I'll have a 
> > look at
> > thats
> > - sockets (including the main syscalls, i.e. accept, bind, select, 
> > listen
> > etc etc)
> > - sockbufs
> I remain in the position that there is absolutely no reason whatever 
> that sockets need have their own syscalls: the current system works 
> quite well and is vastly more extensible.

Not that I would really object against you, but it has an advantage: 
you can easily use networking functions from kernel drivers or file 
systems; you can use that API from everywhere.

Adios...
   Axel.







[ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
Everything else ©2007 Avenir Technologies, LLC.