
|
[openbeosnetteam]
||
[Date Prev]
[06-2002 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[06-2002 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...
- From: "Philippe Houdoin" <philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 10:47:54 +0200 (added by postmaster@wanadoo.fr)
Nathan wrote:
> David wrote:
> > Why do you think they don't need a syscall? Why is the driver more
> > extensible?
>
> From the point of view of the kernel, adding special cases for
anything
> is usually a bad idea. Also, if we were to want to update that, and
it
> was compiled into the kernel, we would have to re-release the kernel
> too, which would be unfortunate. Finally, there really isn't any
> advantage to a syscall: open() for socket() and ioctl() for the rest
> really work just as well, without any real speed problems.
> -Nathan
I totally agree the Nathan point of view.
-Philippe
--
Fortune Cookie Says:
Think twice before speaking, but don't say "think think click click".
|

|