Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



[openbeosnetteam] || [Date Prev] [06-2002 Date Index] [Date Next] || [Thread Prev] [06-2002 Thread Index] [Thread Next]

[openbeosnetteam] Re: Kernel move...

  • From: "Philippe Houdoin" <philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 10:47:54 +0200 (added by postmaster@wanadoo.fr)
Nathan wrote:
> David wrote:
> > Why do you think they don't need a syscall? Why is the driver more
> > extensible?
> 
> From the point of view of the kernel, adding special cases for 
anything 
> is usually a bad idea. Also, if we were to want to update that, and 
it 
> was compiled into the kernel, we would have to re-release the kernel 
> too, which would be unfortunate. Finally, there really isn't any 
> advantage to a syscall: open() for socket() and ioctl() for the rest 
> really work just as well, without any real speed problems.
> -Nathan

I totally agree the Nathan point of view.

-Philippe

--
Fortune Cookie Says:

Think twice before speaking, but don't say "think think click click".






[ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
Everything else ©2007 Avenir Technologies, LLC.