
|
[openbeosnetteam]
||
[Date Prev]
[05-2002 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[05-2002 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeosnetteam] Re: It doesn't look like you will be getting kernel support on ppc
- From: philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 13:10:15 +0200 (MEST)
> > BeOS PPC don't have any busses-controlers kernel modules too?
>
> Not really. Most of it is done with OF.
Sorry, but "OF" stand for?...
> Heh. That would mean editing the PEF binary by hand... (I do know the
> addresses of the functions from the xMAP)
What I've in mind was coding our own open_module_list() & co functions.
It should not be so difficult, if opendir() is available from ppc kernel...
<hope>
As far as we don't have to code get_module() and put_module().
We don't, right?
</hope>
> -nostart is a gcc only option :P It means to build a shared library.
> If you try to build a userland version, there is no main() function
> (net_server.c is not included) and we tell the compiler not to care.
> Therefore, it is rather difficult to build an app.
If userland build don't include net_server.c, it's a proof
that's broken!
Or... or David start to move to a debug-purpose only userland stack, so
the main() should be in the testing app, which will link against
the stack, coming in shared library form?
David?
-Philippe
|

|