Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



[openbeosnetteam] || [Date Prev] [05-2002 Date Index] [Date Next] || [Thread Prev] [05-2002 Thread Index] [Thread Next]

[openbeosnetteam] Re: End of select on R5

  • From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 17:25:27 CEST (+0200)
> BTW, I am getting a bit concerned by the high number of sem's that 
> we're
> using. I think we'll need to work hard to reduce this, but the 
> schemes I
> have in mind are mainly for when we get into the kernel :(

If the BeOS kernel wouldn't limit them, semaphores would be more or 
less cheap - the way I see it :)
I could imagine that NewOS does a better job here, but I haven't looked 
at it yet - Michael mentioned once dynamically growing arrays, but I 
don't know if that was only on the wishlist.
Anyway, I have the same problem with BFS, where I am currently using 
two semaphores for every read-write lock (the fast implementation, you 
can fall back to the slow one with a define).

Adios...
   Axel.







[ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
Everything else ©2007 Avenir Technologies, LLC.