
|
[openbeosnetteam]
||
[Date Prev]
[05-2002 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[05-2002 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeosnetteam] Re: End of select on R5
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 17:25:27 CEST (+0200)
> BTW, I am getting a bit concerned by the high number of sem's that
> we're
> using. I think we'll need to work hard to reduce this, but the
> schemes I
> have in mind are mainly for when we get into the kernel :(
If the BeOS kernel wouldn't limit them, semaphores would be more or
less cheap - the way I see it :)
I could imagine that NewOS does a better job here, but I haven't looked
at it yet - Michael mentioned once dynamically growing arrays, but I
don't know if that was only on the wishlist.
Anyway, I have the same problem with BFS, where I am currently using
two semaphores for every read-write lock (the fast implementation, you
can fall back to the slow one with a define).
Adios...
Axel.
|

|