
|
[openbeosnetteam]
||
[Date Prev]
[01-2002 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[01-2002 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeosnetteam] Re: Me as well...
- From: Ksyu & Dima <k2d2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:47:50 -0400
Hi again,
dreid@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Oh for a better windows mail client...
>
> I don't think we should be aiming to create BONE or network_server. I think
> we should feel free and unburdened by the past (or convention) to go forth
> and create something new that works and performs. That is after all the
> beos way is it not?
Agreed; but we should not repeat the mistakes
which already have been made by other people (All
user-space network stack for example).
>
> I realise a list of binaries isn't an item high on the list of priorities,
> but often it's important to flesh out a project fully before trying to draw
> the boundries and the requirements, wouldn't you agree? As long as people
> feel free to contribute at the moment and say whatever they feel hopefully
> we won't have too many "damn, we missed this" type events :)
I will certainly agree with this. What I meant was
that if we have a stack that is designed with
Posix- and bsd-compatibility in mind we should not
have problems (maybe significant problems would be
better ;-)) porting applications, and therefore
the list of application should interpreted as a
test case for compatibility. In other words most
application like ssh, dig, etc. should compile
"out of the box" (or at least network part should
not cause any problems).
>
> I'd like to think that having posix compatibility would be high on
> everyones list of priorities, as really the best understood networking code
> is that using the BSD interfaces, and if we are to have a hope of getting a
> truly useful network stack we need to be able to test and know the results
> we expect. Also this makes moving code over much easier.
>
> We'd all like more native apps, but the fact is that if we allow people to
> reuse unix-type sockets/network code then the developer can concentrate far
> more on getting the interface and the usability right - which has to be
> good news. We've been blessed with a very good set of highly usable apps
> for beos, let's see if we can't help that trend continue and grow :)
I think we are trying to say the same thing...
>
> Man, do I go on at times :)
:-D That was good, though.
>
> david
Dmitri
|

|