
|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[12-2006 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[12-2006 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: Windows Vista Performance Kludges (that Haiku does
- From: "Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki)" <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:21:30 -0800
Hi,
Ryan Leavengood wrote:
On 12/13/06, Simon Taylor <simontaylor1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do feel Haiku needs some more formal way of preventing bloat. At the
moment it is
safeguarded by the people who have SVN access having the "right idea".
In future
though, Haiku is likely to be swamped with contributions from people
from Linux
backgrounds adding the particular features they feel they couldn't
live without, and I think
Haiku needs a way of dealing with that. Honestly I think we will have
a fight on our hands
to prevent the Haiku user experience tending towards that of Linux -
the only reason I'm
still following Haiku is I believe it's one we can win.
I think this is an extremely important point and more or less
summarizes well why I started this email thread. Haiku can achieve
this ideal, but it will require vigilance.
For example, today I committed some code that will result in two new
default Tracker add-ons (making a total of four so far.) I was
somewhat hesitant to add these, but their simplicity and need (in my
mind) caused me to go ahead and add them. Of course if others decided
the system would be better off without them I wouldn't fight too much
(we have BeBits after all), but I think here we are OK. Still it can
be a slippery slope and before we know it we have 10 default Tracker
add-ons (to continue the example at hand.)
It is not so much the number of features that make for complexity, but
more the way the system exposes those features to the user. You can have
the features needed by a wide range of users and do so in a way that is
not complex or difficult to use. That's what Haiku should strive for, IMHO.
Cheers,
Koki
|

|