
|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[12-2006 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[12-2006 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: Windows Vista Performance Kludges (that Haiku does not need)
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:49:47 +0100 (MET)
"François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Don't diss everything just because it's used at Microsoft...
> > Indeed. Even though I find using memory sticks as a cache
> > ridiculuous,
> swapping on flash ?? really the last thing you want.
> flash memory has a very low maximum number of write cycles before
> failure, swapping or caching on them is a very bad idea. sleeping
> means
> much less changes, so it's probably ok.
Vista doesn't use it for sleeping - because you could remove/replace
the stick while the system is powered down; it can't trust it.
> > having and using the new built-in flash drives is a neat thing. In
> flash in disk drives ??
> Is that the new thing they came up with to speed up the renewal of
> the
> installed base, so if the drive head doesn't screw up Vista swapping
> to
> the flash makes sure the drive dies after a year and you buy another
> one ?
Exactly! :-)
Your usual laptop won't live that long anyway ;-)
Seriously, though, that was also my first thought when I heard of that
feature - I didn't look into it yet, but I'd be interested if there
were any changes to allow more write cycles.
Bye,
Axel.
|

|