
|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[12-2003 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[12-2003 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: AW: Re: AW: Locale Kit
- From: "Nathan Whitehorn" <nathanw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:39:47 -0500
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | [mailto:openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Scott MacMaster
> | Sent: 22 December 2003 18:36
> | To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | Subject: [openbeos] Re: AW: Re: AW: Locale Kit
> |
> |
> | > Don't quite get this - what has gender to do with sort order ?
> |
> | As far as I know, nothing. The issue of gender was brought
> | up in reference
> | to searching.
> Fair enough.
> | > What appears to be the fly in the ointment in this case is
> | those strange
> | > little 'accent' thingies some of the southern European
> | languages seem
> | > to need. Are they really necessary, or can they be ignored ? -
> and
> | > why are they needed anyway when languages such as English,
> American
> | > and Australian get along fine without them.
> |
> | What about that pesky apostrophe? Other languages like
> | Spanish seem to get
> | along fine without abbreviations. Why don't (do not) we drop that
> | apostrophe and simplify English. It'll (It will) definitely help
> | non-English speakers learn English.
> As I would have thought you'd realise, the apostrophe has two
> distinct uses:
> - to allow the written language to more closely follow how it is
> actually spoken; as to say 'we will' instead of 'we'll'.
> - to distinguish between a plural and a possessive; as with '(bunch
> of) grapes' or '(the) grape's (skin)'.
> Without it, or if used improperly, written English could be quite
> confusing.
The point was that the same is true of other languages, with respect to
accents. Speakers of most other languages couldn't care less about the
preservation of apostrophes, though.
-Nathan
|

|