
|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[12-2001 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[12-2001 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: I know I'll get flamed for this but....
- From: "Ithamar R. Adema" <ithamar@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 10:53:30 +0100
Hi Helmar,
>Or is it really only a matter of recompiling the app, IOW am
>I overcomplicating the breaking of BC=3F
Yup, it is, and yup you are :) As we're focusing on BC, our API will be
so close to the current BeOS that no app will see a diference :) Even
if we dump BC halfway through, we still got a source-base which is even
closer to source-compatibility then someone who started from scratch :)
To achieve BC all =5Fpublic=5F APIs will have to stay the same, and quite
some internal =5FAPI=5F as well. The implementation may be completely
different, as long as behavior and API is the same, both BC and SC will
work :)
The focus on unit tests with OpenBeOS is a good showcase of how to get
the =5Fbehavior=5F the same, which is, IMHO, the most difficult things.
With the application kit, for example, we've already found parts of the
BeBook lying about what a method actually =5Fdid=5F return :)
Anyway, IMHO, and I only speak for myself here, BC focus will =5Fat
least=5F get us a higher-grade SC, even if we abondon BC later :)
Regards,
Ithamar.
|

|