|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[12-2001 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[12-2001 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: read this article...
- From: fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 00:22:08 +0100
When you choose a path in your live you could not digress or you would
be turning around a circle. Surely OpenBeOS is not a research project,
but it will keep BeOS alive.
There should be a balance between a architectonically perfect OS and a
commercial OS. If you change APIs frequently programmer could not
maintain their applications, especially if they are free or charge.
Developing an alternative OS in a monopolized world is not enough risk
for you?
On Monday, December 3, 2001, at 11:53 PM, Alex Jeppesen wrote:
> Read this article at http://www.beunited.org/index.php?beos_reform
> its about re-creating beos. it made a good point about how binary
> compatability will make it so you cannot use gcc 3.0 This is a big big
> problem i belive. v3.0 produces better code on many levels and i think
> its worth it to move on up. Anyone else? What do the OpenBeOS ppl think?
>
>
>
|
|
