
|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[11-2001 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[11-2001 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: OpenBeOS Source Tree
- From: Erik Jakowatz <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 12:02:34 -0800
The IK Team has been toying with the idea of using JAM instead of make.
Here's a lovely informational URL:
http://www.perforce.com/jam/jam.html
One of the attractive features is that JAM is supposed to be quite easy
to use for large projects: "Jam/MR can build large projects spread
across many directories in one pass, without recursing, tracking the
relationships among all files."
Those who wish to get the full-bore overview should see (apparently a
little dated):
http://www.perforce.com/jam/doc/jam.paper.html
Anyway, seems like a good time to toss the idea out to the group at
large. =) I recall someone mentioning that Be was using JAM instead of
make (Cedric??). Perforce also uses it to manage their own build
process -- which, with all the platforms they support, has got to be
pretty crazy.
e
Duncan Wilcox wrote:
>
> > Hello. My name is Aaron Davis. I am now the build meister for OpenBeOS.
> > Michael told me my first assignment was to investigate what everyone thought
> > of as a good source tree and then make something that everyone can live
> > with.
> > So thats what i'm doing. Feel free to e-mail me suggestions to my address
> > (iceman@xxxxxxxxxxxx) or to the list. Any input would help me revise the
> > current source tree. Thanks.
>
> http://www.pcug.org.au/~millerp/rmch/recu-make-cons-harm.html
>
> It's quite hard to design a non-recursive makefile tree that is flexible and
> powerful, but it really pays off.
>
> Duncan
|

|