
|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[10-2004 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[10-2004 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: Organizational question
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:50:39 +0200 CEST
Niels Reedijk <Niels.Reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Arch isn't very complicated to use, it's crude. That might seem
> identical, but it isn't. It is true that the comments for arch seem
> difficult, or to explicit. However, all commands are consistent and
> understandable. As soon as you get into the workflow, you will know
> the proper commands for everyday use, and it will be easy enough to
> collect other information from the reference for more specialised
> tasks.
I read a short introduction to arch as well, and I think it's way to
complicated to create a patch and to submit it. IMO let's rather wait
for a later version or branch of it before thinking to adopt it; it's a
bit too simple in what it does now.
Bye,
Axel.
|

|