Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



[openbeos] || [Date Prev] [10-2004 Date Index] [Date Next] || [Thread Prev] [10-2004 Thread Index] [Thread Next]

[openbeos] Re: Organizational question

  • From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:50:39 +0200 CEST
Niels Reedijk <Niels.Reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Arch isn't very complicated to use, it's crude. That might seem
> identical, but it isn't. It is true that the comments for arch seem
> difficult, or to explicit. However, all commands are consistent and
> understandable. As soon as you get into the workflow, you will know
> the proper commands for everyday use, and it will be easy enough to
> collect other information from the reference for more specialised
> tasks.

I read a short introduction to arch as well, and I think it's way to 
complicated to create a patch and to submit it. IMO let's rather wait 
for a later version or branch of it before thinking to adopt it; it's a 
bit too simple in what it does now.

Bye,
   Axel.






[ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
Everything else ©2007 Avenir Technologies, LLC.