FreeLists / openbeos / [openbeos] Re: Organizational question

["Marco Awater" <theo.awater@xxxxxxxxx>]

Maybe those who are familiar with the different version control systems
mentioned could post a list of features (and missing features compared to
other systems) and a list of pro's/con's, so that we can look at what we
want/need and which system matches our needs best. That is, if we are really
looking to switch (maybe someone could post a similar list for our current
system so it is also a participant in the discussion).

Marco


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 2:10 AM
Subject: [openbeos] Re: Organizational question


> "Niels Reedijk" <n.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I have been working with arch now for a while (www.gnuarch.org and
> > wiki.gnuarch.org) and I basically fell in love with it. It is a very
> > powerful tool, albeit a bit crude, that will definitely be the
> > development
> > model of the future. I have been making some personal notes on how
> > this tool
> > could be implemented in this project, and I will be able to elaborate
> > on it
> > a bit if anyone cares. After all, wouldn't it be cool to be able to
> > pull the
> > latest stable revision of haiku including an experimental kernel and
> > experimental usb2 support?
>
> I noticed that you already work the way you described when I look at
> your change logs :)
> Anyway, you should always be able to have that (latest stable Haiku
> with experimental parts) using branches in almost any versioning system
> - the question is just how simple it is to use :)
>
> But if you bring gnuarch on the table, I see no reason why we shouldn't
> consider it, too.
>
> Bye,
>    Axel.
>
>
>