|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[10-2004 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[10-2004 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: gcc again
- From: "David A. Rogers" <darogers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:14:20 -0500 (Central Daylight Time)
Is/will Oliver's version be blessed by the kit leaders? Will the build
machine be moved over at some point?
dar
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, Ingo Weinhold wrote:
>
> On 2004-10-02 at 09:26:15 [+0200], Matthijs Hollemans wrote:
> > David A. Rogers wrote:
> >
> >
> > > From what I've been able to tell, the geekgadgets gcc 2.9-beos-000224 is
> > > later (better) than the R5 version 2.9-beos-991026. However, I haven't
> > > been able to find any place to download it from. It doesn't seem like
> > > the geekgadgets site exists.
> >
> > This is the URL:
> > ftp://ftp.geekgadgets.org/pub/geekgadgets/be/i586/snapshots/current/bin/gnupro-000224-bin.tgz
> >
> > Unfortunately, the site seems to be down and has been for a few weeks now.
>
> Yep, the site has been shutdown for good. The Amiga portion is hosted
> somewhere else now, but the BeOS portion is gone.
>
> Anyway, I would recommend Oliver's gcc 2.95.3.
>
> CU, Ingo
>
>
>
|
|
