
|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[09-2007 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[09-2007 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: Haiku logo font
- From: "Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki)" <koki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 15:48:49 -0700
Stephan Assmus wrote:
Hi Jorge,
Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki) wrote (2007-09-01, 23:57:57 [+0200]):
DarkWyrm wrote:
I did a visual comparison, and here it is how it turned out:
http://myhaiku.org/haiku/haiku-logo_font-comparison.png
Please note that the Limerick font is a bitmap, so it may be not very
accurate. However IMHO, from an overall balance, thickness and shape
POV, Limerick looks the closest that I have seen so far to the font
used in the Haiku logo.
Thank you for the visual comparison. I did some searching and the
problem is not the font family, but the weight. The specific font used
was Futura Medium, also called just regular Futura. Futura Book has
slight differences -- as you pointed out -- besides just the general
thickness of the letters. The connection of the capital K is different
in the two weights. There may be some further tweaking (kerning, etc.)
that you might have to do, but it is the one. You can see a preview of
the specific font at
http://typenav.fontshop.com/details.asp?GIFID=520369
Bingo!
http://myhaiku.org/haiku/haiku-logo_font-comparison-2.png
Thanks DarkWyrm for helping solve the mystery. ;)
I did mention "Futura Medium" in my first reply, though DarkWyrm pointed
out the difference in the shape of the K. :-)
Indeed. So, thanks to you too. :)
I have the Futura font set, and thought that included the font used for
the logo; as it turns out, I was wrong. :)
Cheers,
Koki
|

|