|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[07-2003 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[07-2003 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: OT Re: drive letter vs. mounten
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2003 22:14:44 +0200 CEST
"Michael Phipps" <mphipps1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> was really nice when people used removable media a lot), the concept
> of being able > to say:
> assign vm: /boot/home/Development/current/src/kernel/core/vm2
> is sorely missed by ex-Amigans.
>
> Then say "cd vm:" or "ls -la vm:" would be very nice. Certainly not
> an R1 thing. It
> would have to be an enhancement to the vfs to hold a hash table of
> name-->path
> mappings. But it would be very cool.
"vm:" is part of the root name space - that's what / is for in BeOS and
Unix.
So to do exactly the same as above (including missing persistence):
$ ln -s /vm /boot/home/Development/current/src/kernel/core/vm2
$ cd /vm
Where is the big difference? And why should that not be an R1 thing? :-
)
I think the ':' feels a bit different (I still can be counted as an
Amiga user), but it's logically the same.
Adios...
Axel.
|