
|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[07-2003 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[07-2003 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V3 #121
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 15:04:54 +0200 CEST
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would favor a format like the one François mentioned. Even better
> would
> be something compatible to the driver settings format. E.g. an
> extension
> by optional type annotations. If the type is omitted, `string' is
> implied.
> If given, a basic parser (e.g. in the kernel or boot loader) may
> nevertheless ignore the typing info, interpreting everything as
> strings.
> This would allow a certain level of interchangability between
> BMessages
> and driver settings strings. In particular for sending messages from
> the
> kernel to userland this format might be used.
Yes, something like this might be nice, although the driver_settings
format might be a bit unhandy for some types at the moment (for example
BRects), but that could eventually be fixed.
Adios...
Axel.
|

|