|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[06-2002 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[06-2002 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: Now we are *FASTER* than BFS. :)
- From: "Manuel Jesus Petit de Gabriel" <freston@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 21:10:44 -0700
Out of curiosity, is this maintaining the name, size, date indices or
without (both bfs and obfs) ?
manuel,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruno G. Albuquerque" <bga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 12:08 PM
Subject: [openbeos] Now we are *FASTER* than BFS. :)
> Hey guys... Just to let you know about the good news... Right now we
> (OpenBFS) are actually a bit faster than BFS! Granted it was just a
> specific test, but we are at least in the same league as BFS right now!
> :)
>
> Here the hard numbers:
>
> Test 1 (copies 431 small files, about 1.8 MB total):
> total: 20.9s (0.5s transactions, 20.4s sync)
> BFS: 23s (2.3s transaction, 20.8s sync)
>
> Test 2 (copies 2447 small files, about 38.5 MB total):
> total: 3m 35.7s (3m 3.8s transactions, 31.8s sync)
> BFS: 3m 31s (3m 15s transactions, 16s sync)
>
> Good news, heh? :)
>
> -Bruno
>
>
> --
> Fortune Cookie Says:
>
> Reality is for people who lack imagination.
>
|
|
