|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[04-2002 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[04-2002 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: Why Resurrect BeOS?
- From: Michael Noisternig <michael.noisternig@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 14:45:14 +0200
Sorry, but you make me continue this thread.
Why NT is not a micro-kernel...
A micro-kernel has only the most important things running in kernel
space, that is dispatching, message passing and low-level I/O support
and protection.
Now NT also has the so-called managers (object manager, memory manager,
security manager, ...), networking, the I/O system and even the Win32
subsystem in kernel mode.
Michael
Brian Goff wrote:
It's not a joke.
And yes, as said before, this is way off topic.
-----Original Message-----
From: openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Noisternig
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 5:45 AM
To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [openbeos] Re: Why Resurrect BeOS?
What makes you think that Windows is intricate? Have you ever seen the
code? I don't think so. I hate to tell you this, but the NT kernel
IS
a microkernel, and NT is also highly modular.
LOL! That's a good April Fools joke!
|
|
