
|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[03-2007 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[03-2007 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: API documentation (part III?)
- From: "Niels Reedijk" <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:05:30 +0100
2007/3/2, Niklas Nisbeth <noisetonepause@xxxxxxxxx>:
> So what will we be losing? Well, some output formats. Docbook is
> capable to being transformed into PDF. Doxygen is as well, but with a
> detour and it probably won't turn out to be very good because of some
> of the tricks I use. I haven't tried it though. Is this a bad thing?
> In my opinion it isn't. I doubt anyone is going to print out the
> whole
> thing and use it instead of the conveniently hyperlinked and up to
> date online version. Seriously, if we ever need to have a good PDF
> for
> whatever reason, we'll work it out when the time comes.
This wouldn't happen to be what you're thinking of, would it:
http://www.iwriteiam.nl/html2tex.html
It is supposed to work reasonably well... And LaTeX PDFs look stunning,
as you no doubt know.
As a matter of fact, I didn't. But I believe you in an instant. And
Doxygen outputs Latex natively, even though I never looked at it, I
imagine the output is well suited for a linear way of looking at the
API documentation.
Niels
|

|