Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



[openbeos] || [Date Prev] [02-2002 Date Index] [Date Next] || [Thread Prev] [02-2002 Thread Index] [Thread Next]

[openbeos] Re: OpenBeOS Applications

  • From: John Ryerson <johnryerson@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 15:36:56 -0500
Andrew Edward McCall wrote:
Hi all,

I have been talking to Geoffrey Longo regarding the re-implementation of the OpenBeOS Applications, the ones you see after a new install when you go BeOS Menu->Applications.

Most of them are going to be fine to be re-implemented, but some I have doubts on why we should actually do it. Below are the applications I am questioning.

I also know that a fair few of the applications have their source code available with BeOS anyway, what happens about these? Can we use the code, or do we have to re-write them still?

N+
==

Other than being fast, this was always always crap (IMO - I know there are people who loved it). I would suggest settling on BeZilla as our default browser (like we have much choice anyway). Perhaps we can make a OpenBeOS distribution of it, packaging it up nicely and give it a BeOS theme? I really don't think that now is the time to be making another web-rendering engine.

If people object to the whole BeZilla, why don't we use the Mozilla rendering engine and create a simple browser like Gaelon does?

PoorMan
=====

This was actually OK... but is it really worth writing a web server when Apache 1.3x and Apache 2.x have been ported.

I would suggest getting the Apache 2.x port up to date, and creating a GUI to httpd.conf instead of PoorMan. (Heh - ApacheMan) - much like MacOS X does, we could even bundle PHP with it.


Terminal =====

Why don't we just port the latest version of Bash, and use that instead?


BeIDE ====

I don't know what to do about this - discussions welcome!

BeMail
====

I don't know what to do about this either, I *really* like BeMail, but if we are going to bundle BeZilla, do we need to rewrite BeMail? I have a feeling that the answer will be yes here :)

Thanks

Andrew Edward McCall
mccall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
OpenBeOS! - Join the revolution now!
http://www.openbeos.org/






Why not just use RobinHood to replace PoorMan?


And as for browser I say work on getting Bezilla as bug free as possible, stable, & fast then work on making a netpositive skin for it, oh and if we just need the web browser then why waste time fixing mail, chatzilla, composer bugs *right now* because we could just compile the browser for OBOS. Or we could work on all of that and just make beos type skins; like a Bemail skin for Mail & Newsgroups. That is the power of XUL.

--
John Ryerson

http://www.sivax.net






[ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
Everything else ©2007 Avenir Technologies, LLC.