
|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[02-2002 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[02-2002 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V2 #33
- From: François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 22:38:53 +0100 (MET)
As I already said, it's far better in the sense that it forces you to cut the
thing in 2 parts, the one that does networking stuff, and the one that does the
GUI stuff. It is Bad (tm) IMO to do anything GUI related in a network stack
even if "yeah it's userland and I can do it...". Even if a userland stack
permits to use the same binary it's not a good idea to open a window from
inside the net_server team. This should be done either by the same binary if
it's run as a program (then it should attach to some shared memory or
query a port), or by another bin.
En réponse à Nathan Whitehorn <nathan.whitehorn@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
[snip....]
>
> Well, the add-on installs the network add-on. Besides, they couldn't be
>
> in the same binary using BONE. The kernel won't let you link against
> user-land symbols, which means no BViews anywhere in your binary, even
>
> if they aren't called. So different binaries are required.
|

|