Go to the FreeLists Home Page Home Signup Help Login
 



[openbeos] || [Date Prev] [02-2002 Date Index] [Date Next] || [Thread Prev] [02-2002 Thread Index] [Thread Next]

[openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V2 #33

  • From: François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 22:38:53 +0100 (MET)
As I already said, it's far better in the sense that it forces you to cut the 
thing in 2 parts, the one that does networking stuff, and the one that does the 
GUI stuff. It is Bad (tm) IMO to do anything GUI related in a network stack 
even if "yeah it's userland and I can do it...". Even if a userland stack
permits to use the same binary it's not a good idea to open a window from 
inside the net_server team. This should be done either by the same binary if 
it's run as a program (then it should attach to some shared memory or 
query a port), or by another bin.

En réponse à Nathan Whitehorn <nathan.whitehorn@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
[snip....]
> 
> Well, the add-on installs the network add-on. Besides, they couldn't be
> 
> in the same binary using BONE. The kernel won't let you link against 
> user-land symbols, which means no BViews anywhere in your binary, even
> 
> if they aren't called. So different binaries are required.






[ Home | Signup | Help | Login | Archives | Lists ]

All trademarks and copyrights within the FreeLists archives are owned by their respective owners.
Everything else ©2007 Avenir Technologies, LLC.