|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[01-2005 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[01-2005 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 21:39:26 +0100 CET
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2005-01-09 at 18:03:00 [+0100], Axel Dörfler wrote:
> > "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > True bu it isn't bound by having an on-disk layout.
> > > BFS stores the nodes leaf name in itself, as well as the inode of
> > > the
> > > parent folder. that wouldn't work for hardlinks.
> > Nothing keeps BFS from storing other parent directories as well;
> > ie.
> > that would just be one more internal use of attributes (like the
> > filename).
> If it's that easy, then forget about indexing entries instead of
> nodes. :-)
Yes, changing the B+tree implementation to be able to store entries
would be much more complicated :-)
Bye,
Axel.
|
|
