
|
[openbeos]
||
[Date Prev]
[01-2005 Date Index]
[Date Next]
||
[Thread Prev]
[01-2005 Thread Index]
[Thread Next]
[openbeos] Re: kernel mime_table module
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:56:49 +0100 CET
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If I understand you correctly, you would fix BNodeInfo to ask the
> > roster about the type for the given file - I am not sure if it's a
> > good
> > idea to do a full lookup there, though (again, speed
> > considerations).
> No, I don't think I would change BNodeInfo. For a node on a FS that
> doesn't
> support attributes or MIME types, the Tracker shouldn't even try to
> get
> data from a BNodeInfo object, but instead sniff the type and get the
> info
> from BMimeType.
I would chose BNodeInfo as a starting point, as this class is the one
that abstracts the file type stuff from the implementation.
Whenever a file does not have the BEOS:TYPE attribute set (for whatever
reason), it could get the type via the file extension only.
This way, all applications would benefit from this -- why should we aim
for a Tracker only solution here (or at least have all applications do
this extra work)?
> > If I open up a folder with thousand files, how much slower will it
> > get
> > because of that?
> Don't know. But, unless I'm mistaken here, the Tracker currently
> lazily
> gets the information when needed (i.e. when an entry is about to be
> displayed). So I wouldn't expect a significant slow-down when opening
> a
> large folder, since there's only overhead for the visible entries.
> But to
> be sure this needs to be verified by tests. If it is slow indeed, the
> sniffing can as well be done as a background task.
I am not sure when Tracker does this; I would guess that it only loads
additional attributes on demand, but not determine the file type this
way.
> > Anyway, in whatever way we will solve this, I think this is
> > something
> > we should definitely do before R1.
> Yep.
After R1, I want to introduce file system layers, so that we can just
plug in generic attribute support for all file systems that don't
support them natively. That should also simplify a couple of things :)
Bye,
Axel.
|

|